Understanding and responding to the concerns and priorities of local communities are significant elements in building trust and maintaining a social licence to operate, as well as securing continued access to land and resources.
Community members view
core samples at the Goldbrook
exploration camp in northern Canada.
Site visits are an important aspect of
building community trust.
As a contribution to the sustainable development of the countries, regions and communities where we have a significant presence, we work at national level and at local levels on issues such as anticorruption, transparency, the investment climate, enterprise development, training, social investment and capacity building. Our operations are not development agencies but they play a significant development role with a sometimes unique ability to mobilise skills and capacities in their areas of influence.
No aspect of sustainable development can be dealt with in isolation and our programme is designed to see the reduction of negative impacts and an increase in opportunities across the spectrum (see Sustainable development programme), so there are close linkages between community engagement, environmental projects(see Biodiversty) and economic development.(see Empowerment through enterprise)
The need to increase employment rates is one of the key issues around the world and the socio-economic assessments we conduct also regularly identify this. Yet, as mining has be some more technologically advanced, we are often unable to meet all the expectations about direct employment, particularly for unskilled workers.
We use supply chain opportunities and enterprise development schemes (see Empowerment through enterprise) to maximise the local economic benefits of our operations. We are also increasingly looking at new models for sharing with local communities the benefits flowing from our operations.
Community engagement
All our significant operations are annually required to review their community engagement plans. These plans have a three-year time horizon and identify stakeholders, the channels to be used for engagement, key issues and the impacts to be managed. They require management to assign accountabilities and resources. These plans ensure that operations are more accountable to neighbouring communities for their impacts on the community and the environment and that mutual understanding of concerns improves. Community engagement plans are now in place at 130 of 134 significant sites (108 excluding Mondi, Highveld and Hippo Valley).
Some 250 Anglo American managers and people from partner organisations have been trained in the use of our socio-economic assessment toolbox (SEAT). The quality of engagement has increased markedly in those operations. Since we began using SEAT, 40 assessments have been completed at 42 of our larger operations. Twelve are in an advanced stage and another 10 are in the planning stage.
The most commonly occurring issues of concern to communities to emerge from SEAT implementation include:
- access to jobs and procurement opportunities
- perceived or actual environmental and health impacts
- road safety and impacts related to transport of product and supplies
- the need for improved communication and transparency, and
- infrastructure, public services and, in some situations, in-migration.
Lack of effective communication is often the root cause of distrust and capacity building is often a prerequisite for establishing durable partnerships. The community’s perceptions are their reality and we must address them. We are also learning that the inter-relationships and rivalries between stakeholder groups are rarely static and can have as big
an impact on the operation as
its own relationships with any
one group.
External stakeholders |
Key channels for engagement in 2006 |
Investors
|
Results presentations and road shows, annual presentations, sustainable
development presentations, bilateral meetings and surveys |
Governments
|
Direct engagement and through industry associations, national
partnerships, international partnerships |
International organisations
|
Membership of UN Global Compact, ICMM, WBCSD and Global Business
Coalition on HIV/AIDS, EITI, Voluntary Principles on Security and Human
Rights. Dialogue with the International Finance Corporation, the World Bank
and UN |
Communities
|
Community engagement plans, SEAT, various public forums and meetings,
impact assessments, complaints procedures and whistle-blowing |
Contractors and suppliers
|
Commercial interactions, tender and compliance processes, open days,
safety inductions |
Customers
|
Commercial relationships, complaints procedures, surveys |
NGOs |
Engagement on specific issues, involvement in partnerships (e.g. on
transparency, biodiversity, human rights or HIV), memberships,
social investment |
Based on the feedback
received from the first
40 implementations (27 in core
businesses), from
external partners and
independent experts and from
other emerging examples of
good practice, SEAT has been
undergoing revision. SEAT II will
be launched in 2007.
The new version maintains the
same structure but will consist
of some 30 tools, including
new guidance on issues such
as conflict identification,
prevention and management,
grievance procedures as well
as the community dimension
of emergency planning and
resettlement. In addition, there
will be a number of tools to
support our responses in areas
such as community health,
leveraging donor resources,
microfinance and water and
energy projects. Further
information and the SEAT
executive summary can be found on our website.
Stakeholder
engagement
Regular engagement
strengthens our business
through ensuring that we
understand the perspectives
of others, and improves our
ability to develop strategy
through increasing our
understanding of national
and international trends,
developments and concerns.
We encourage it at all levels in
the organisation from site to
the corporate level, including
through initiatives to improve
employee communication (see
Building human capital across the world). Some key examples
are highlighted below. More
information is on our website.
Anglo American’s Exploration
division consulted local
residents in February 2006
before beginning a geophysical
survey to explore potential
mining opportunities in the
Stavely project in Victoria,
Australia.
Around 40 landowners attended
a meeting where the Exploration
personnel explained what
impact the survey (using nondisruptive
methods) would
have on them and what it
aimed to achieve. This initial
meeting has opened a dialogue
with the community and gave
residents an opportunity to
raise concerns. Issues raised
by the pastoralists included the
manner in which the notification
of entry was delivered by
the company, compensation
amounts, the company’s public
liability insurance, bushfires,
timing of work related to
lambing and crops, the length
of the agreement and means of
future communication with the
company. All these issues were
resolved or followed up with
individuals, where appropriate.
Since 2003, Anglo American’s
Brazilian operations have been
actively identifying, mapping
and interviewing stakeholders in
the neighbouring municipalities
of Níquelândia, Barro Alto,
Ouvidor and Catalão, as well
as the industrial town of
Cubatão, as part of the SEAT
process. Improved mutual
understanding of community
priorities, expectations and their
perceptions of the positive and
negative impacts of the mines
resulted in more formalised
community engagement
programmes and immediate
benefits for the operations.
The issues identified included
job security (Níquelândia), lack
of infrastructure (Barro Alto),
and health and water resources
(Catalão). In Cubatão, where
the municipality is launching a
local Agenda 21 project, the
engagement enabled discussion
of strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities and threats.
A new ‘Interchange’
communication channel was
created and a new set of criteria
for community investment
developed. In addition, an NGO
with extensive experience in
local capacity building was
appointed to assist with building
partnerships which would have
local economic benefits.
The company is looking
for creative partnerships
or projects with NGOs to
generate resources and make
a difference. Projects being
evaluated include technical
support for small-scale farmers’
local and regional associations,
skills development for school
teachers and principals, and
development of small-scale
businesses for a 300 year old
religious organisation
so that individuals can earn
money while maintaining their
traditions.
Some specific partnerships
on environmental education
were initiated during various
communication sessions. At
Barro Alto, the community
outreach occurred before the
approval of the new mine
project, paving the way for
positive engagement and fruitful
partnership.
|